Cuevas denies Inquirer story but transcript says otherwise
Statements of somebody given to the media is admissible in court as evidence. Mabigat talaga ang sasabihin ng media especially if it is backed up with transcript or video and/or audio recording.
Panindigan na ni Cuevas ang sinabi niya lalo na kung totoo ito kasi unfair itong ginawa na ito sa kanya. Pag natalo si Corona, pag isipan pa ng masama si Cuevas na nilaglag niya ang kanyang kliyente.
Pero bakit humihingi ng tawad si Cuevas sa Malacanang eh wala naman siyang kasalanan?
Pero bakit humihingi ng tawad si Cuevas sa Malacanang eh wala naman siyang kasalanan?
Unlike the judge hearing the case of Abalos however, Malacanang can not charge Cuevas for contempt because it does not have the power to do it. The group of Cuevas and he himself I think will be the one to evaluate this sad incident. Either the Inquirer is lying or Cuevas.
The records will bear the truth and the liar should be exposed!!!
0 Responses:
Post a Comment