Aquino’s double kill of Arroyo sends chills down public’s spine according to a noted columnist BUT I FULLY DISAGREE with due respect!!!
With due respect the contention of this columnist is far from the truth!
Who among the public fears for their safety because of this government's effort to make anyone answerable for his wrong deeds? Maybe only those who have reasons to fear for having committed misdeeds which before they can get away with but now they will be made to answer?
The Daily Tribune despite playing consistently its role as fiscalizer, as far as I am concerned, make its observations in opposition to the administration always based on reality. That is what we need in democracy for everybody to make his own opinion but for one to have his own reality, (pardon me) like this columnist, it seems that he is trying hard doing public relations for somebody. Please read this http://opinion.inquirer.net/17677/aquino%e2%80%99s-double-kill-of-arroyo-sends-chills-down-public%e2%80%99s-spine
Is there such as a thing as policy of obsession for accountability and transparency which makes this administration guilty of such? Di ba this is what we ordinary Filipinos want for our public servants to be accountable and transparent?
The issue here is not whether one is for PNoy or for CGMA. The issue here is what is good for the Filipinos and we can not agree unless we are honest with what reality is. The issue is not ideological which may make perception of realities differ.
PNoy and CGMA and we who live in this generation are all passing from this world but what legacy are we leaving to the next generations which include our chidren and grandchildren and so forth?
Based on informal surveys, the people want change and one of these changes is to do away with graft and corruption which has been there for decades victimizing millions of Filipinos due to the culture of impunity in our country which almost always benefit the powerful corrupt especially those in government. Now one of the suspects of plunder and election sabotage is former PGMA and she wants to leave for abroad while the investigations are going on and the government is convinced that she will not come back if she is allowed to leave, can we blame the government if it made use of DOJ circular 41 which was issued during the time of former PGMA herself to prevent her from leaving?
The columnist is not being forthright when he said that the executive defied the TRO issued by the Supreme Court because as an evidence, a motion for reconsideration in recognition of the authority of the supreme Court was filed by the executive to take back the said TRO.
What is worse despite the claim of the Supreme Court spokesman Midas Marquez that the TRO was executory, it was admitted later by the Supreme Court that the Arroyos failed to comply with one of the requirements set by SC for the TRO to take effect which was for the Arroyos to appoint a common legal representative for former PGMA and FG who can recieve in their behalf summons and other notices by the court while they are abroad.
THEREFORE STRICTLY SPEAKING, THERE WAS NO TRO TO EXECUTE AND TO COMPLY WITH IN THE FIRST PLACE!
Who am I to contest A multi awarded columnist from A very influential daily newspaper of this country but a mosquito volunteer public servant has to speak out the truth becasuse for all we know many think the same way as I do!
With due respect the contention of this columnist is far from the truth!
Who among the public fears for their safety because of this government's effort to make anyone answerable for his wrong deeds? Maybe only those who have reasons to fear for having committed misdeeds which before they can get away with but now they will be made to answer?
The Daily Tribune despite playing consistently its role as fiscalizer, as far as I am concerned, make its observations in opposition to the administration always based on reality. That is what we need in democracy for everybody to make his own opinion but for one to have his own reality, (pardon me) like this columnist, it seems that he is trying hard doing public relations for somebody. Please read this http://opinion.inquirer.net/17677/aquino%e2%80%99s-double-kill-of-arroyo-sends-chills-down-public%e2%80%99s-spine
Is there such as a thing as policy of obsession for accountability and transparency which makes this administration guilty of such? Di ba this is what we ordinary Filipinos want for our public servants to be accountable and transparent?
The issue here is not whether one is for PNoy or for CGMA. The issue here is what is good for the Filipinos and we can not agree unless we are honest with what reality is. The issue is not ideological which may make perception of realities differ.
PNoy and CGMA and we who live in this generation are all passing from this world but what legacy are we leaving to the next generations which include our chidren and grandchildren and so forth?
Based on informal surveys, the people want change and one of these changes is to do away with graft and corruption which has been there for decades victimizing millions of Filipinos due to the culture of impunity in our country which almost always benefit the powerful corrupt especially those in government. Now one of the suspects of plunder and election sabotage is former PGMA and she wants to leave for abroad while the investigations are going on and the government is convinced that she will not come back if she is allowed to leave, can we blame the government if it made use of DOJ circular 41 which was issued during the time of former PGMA herself to prevent her from leaving?
The columnist is not being forthright when he said that the executive defied the TRO issued by the Supreme Court because as an evidence, a motion for reconsideration in recognition of the authority of the supreme Court was filed by the executive to take back the said TRO.
What is worse despite the claim of the Supreme Court spokesman Midas Marquez that the TRO was executory, it was admitted later by the Supreme Court that the Arroyos failed to comply with one of the requirements set by SC for the TRO to take effect which was for the Arroyos to appoint a common legal representative for former PGMA and FG who can recieve in their behalf summons and other notices by the court while they are abroad.
THEREFORE STRICTLY SPEAKING, THERE WAS NO TRO TO EXECUTE AND TO COMPLY WITH IN THE FIRST PLACE!
Who am I to contest A multi awarded columnist from A very influential daily newspaper of this country but a mosquito volunteer public servant has to speak out the truth becasuse for all we know many think the same way as I do!
0 Responses:
Post a Comment